The upcoming s-election: Which CFR-approved presidential candidate will you choose?

"Change" is the catchword in election politics today, as it is in every presidential election. Americans are desperate for change because they're tired: They're tired of the war, they're tired of the lies, and they're tired of seeing their country slowly destroyed by powerful interests. According to the TV pundits this is the reason why Obama and Huckabee won so decisively in the Iowa caucuses -- American voters believe that Obama and Huckabee will be the candidates who can bring them much needed change.

Of course, Obama and Huckabee will bring Americans change, but it will be of a superficial, insubstantial kind: a few more -- or less -- tax breaks, more job training programs, tougher penalties for corporate criminals, and, more toothless promises to get us out of the quagmire of Iraq, or, at least, just to fight it better than Bush.

One thing that will be missing is the promise of REAL change, the kind that would restore our Constitution to its 1778 status, end globalization policies that are destroying U.S. sovereignty, and, most importantly, end the completely fraudulent "war on terror" which is responsible for enacting terrible retribution on millions of innocent people around the world. Obama and Huckabee will not be these agents of change, nor will Hillary or Edwards, nor any of the other top-tiered candidates.

Why is that? It's simple: all of the presidential frontrunners have key advisors from the Council of Foreign Relations -- an organization that is actively promoting the "war on terror" and world government through globalization policies -- missions that are eroding the sovereignty of the United States.

Since the CFR insiders control the major media (see this video below) it shouldn't come as any surprise that Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich are being marginalized and discredited. These candidates have taken positions against CFR "free trade" policies like GATT and NAFTA, have called for stopping the war immediately, and have professed a strong defense of the U.S. Constitution -- something the sanctioned candidates will not do.



Unfortunately, even when these really good choices present themselves to the American people, the vast body of the electorate will not vote for them in the long run because they are told by the CFR-controlled press, and the CFR-controlled RNC and DNC, that these candidates' ideas are fringe; their concepts of protecting the Constitution, protecting American jobs and stopping a illegal war are just not mainstream ideas in a globalized, terror-filled world. We can, however, enjoy the spirited discussions they bring to the debates and fascinate over their old-fashioned beliefs and values. How quaint. (Of course, the corporate media don't exactly frame it this way, but that is essentially why these "fringe" candidates are censored and disparaged.)

Americans should have none of it.

For those of us with our frontal lobes still intact we can look for more exacting method of vetting a candidate than Andy Green's Mr Potato Head test (see picture above) Candidates pose with Clinton's Potato Head; and that is to look at who are the advisors for the top-tiered candidates. Let's start with the Democrats:

Obama:
Obama has CFR member and Trilateral Commission founder Zbigniew Brzezinski advising him. Brzezinski was instrumental in arming the Mujaheddin in Afghanistan and advocating for U.S. bases in the Middle East; and Richard Clarke (CFR), the former counterterrorism czar who cried crocodile tears to the 9/11 families about how the U.S. fail them on September 11, 2001. Interestingly enough, many of Obama advisors are straight from the older Clinton cabinet (see www.danieldrezner.com/archives/003486.html). So much for the "change" candidate.

Hillary:
Hillary has a who's who of prominent CFR members advising her including: Leslie Gelb, president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations; Samuel R. Berger, Bill Clinton's national security advisor; Madeline Albright, Clinton's secretary of state; Welsley Clark, NATO commander and Lee Feinstein, a prominent CFR scholar.

Edwards:
Edwards likes military men advising him, many of them profiting handsomely from the phony War on Terror. Ironically, one non-military advisor is Barry M. Blechman (CFR), President Carter’s assistant director of the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, an agency which was created under a Presidential Directive to disarm sovereign states to bring about world government under control of the UN. Hmmm.

According to Daniel Estulin, an award-winning investigative journalist and expert on the CFR and Bilderberg Group, the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency was sponsored by the CFR "to surrender irrevocably to the United Nations the means of protecting its (the United States) national sovereignty, and, ultimately to confiscate all of the weapons ownded by its own citizens, as party of a planned future global disarmament program." ("The True Story of the Bilderberg Group", 2007, page 101)

And, if that's not scary enough for you, read what investigative journalist, Kelley Beaucar Vlahos, has to say about Obama's and Clinton's advisors:

"...no less than eight names associated with the Clinton and Obama campaigns—including Indyk, Steinberg, and O’Hanlon—have turned up, in some cases multiple times, on statements and letters authored by the Project for the New American Century..."

"Led by former Reagan aide and Hoover Institution fellow Charles Hill, there is Harvard Professor Martin Kramer, who works with the Washington Institute for Near East Policy; Peter Berkowitz of Hoover; Kim Holmes of the Heritage Foundation; Stephen Rosen of Harvard; Enders Wimbush of the Hudson Institute; Commentary eminence Norman Podhoretz; and the newest addition, author Daniel Pipes, who has been waging an online war against American “Islamofascist” college professors."

Kelley Beaucar Vlahos, "War Whisperers", American Conservative Magazine, 2007

Yikes!... and these are just the Democratic candidates. Needless to say on the Republican side it is much worse. See this list from the Washington Post:

"The War Over the Wonks", Washington Post, Oct. 2., 2007

Since all the frontrunners are getting advice from Council of Foreign Relations members we should all be concerned. Unless you understand who the CFR are you won't understand the threat to our country and our freedoms. Read what these experts on the subject have to say:

“The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is the American Branch of a society which originated in England… (and) …believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established.”

...and...

“The powers of financial capitalism had (a) far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank…sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.”

-- Harvard professor and Bill Clinton mentor, Carroll Quigley. (Quigley, who was a supporter of these plans was allowed to study the elite's secret documents for over 15 years. He wrote about them in his book, "Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time and The Anglo-American Establishment.")

... and...

“The main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations is promoting the disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and national independence and submergence into an all powerful, one world government.”

“Once the ruling members of the CFR shadow government have decided that the U.S. Government should adopt a particular policy, the very substantial research facilities of (the) CFR are put to work to develop arguments, intellectual and emotional, to support the new policy, and to confound and discredit, intellectually and politically, any opposition.”

-- U.S. Navy admiral Chester Ward, a former CFR member

So, why doesn't the vast majority of Americans see through this con? Why do we keep bumping into the same group of misty-eyed voters who are adamant that if only their CFR-approved candidate gets into office they would set the world's axis right again -- a faith that is truly astonishing considering the continuous deterioration of the United States right before our eyes under both Democratic and Republican administrations, election after election.

People get fooled because the vast majority of people still get their news from corporate, "cabal" news whose role is to hide these facts from the public.

So, this leaves us with the upcoming s-election. If we want to vote pro-sovereignty, pro-Constitution, anti-war that means that the only candidate we could support is Ron Paul or Cynthia McKinney on the Green Party ticket. (I like Dennis Kucinich, but if he really said that if Hillary and Obama gets the party nomination we should vote for him/her, he has lost my vote.) Personally, I am kind of fond of social security and public education, as well as some safety-net social programs, so Cynthia will get my vote over Paul. She has also promised to re-open a full investigation into 9/11. Here is her website: www.runcynthiarun.org

For more on the candidates' advisors, see:

"The Advisers Are Writing Our Future", The New York Times, April 18, 2007
"Hillary Inc.", The Nation, May 17, 2007
"Bilderberg 'performance' key to Edwards VP pick," World Net Daily, 2004