Saturday, January 26, 2008

Morgellons, chemtrails and nanotechnology:
Is there a connection?

"Bay Area starts first big study of Morgellons," read the January 17, 2008 headline in the Bay Area Section in the San Francisco Chronicle as glimpsed over the shoulder of the man on the BART the other day. Morgellons now here in the Bay Area. Just great.

After being introduce to the horrifying disease a number of years back by an editor at a small newspaper I knew that this was a major story, so I got off the train and immediately bought the Chronicle. I was curious as to why the Bay Area was selected for the study as over the years I hadn't heard a peep about Morgellons in the local media. Maybe I missed the stories as I was absorbed with following the more mundane, like what the crazies in our government were doing to much of humanity due to their fictitious "war on terror".

It's hard to imagine a more difficult subject to write about than Morgellons. Not only is the disease reminiscent of something out of the most macabre science fiction novel, but reading about how the sufferers of the disease get pummeled -- first by the horrible disease itself and then by the mainstream medical establishment is simply heartbreaking. On top of this, there is also the complexity of trying to understand just what exactly is Morgellons: is it a virus, a bacteria, a fungus, a nematode, a GMO mutation, nanotechnology, or is it all in people's heads, like the American Academy of Dermatology claim? However, if that were the case, that it was in people's heads, then what could explain the multi-colored, florescent fibers coming out of sufferers' unbroken skin? That would be observable phenomena, not psychosis.

The article continued: "The study into Morgellons will start immediately, as Kaiser Permanente contacts Northern California patients who have reported symptoms of the mystery disease in the past 18 months. The research will be funded by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention." Later on in The Washington Post I read that the CDC is hoping to send the fibers collected from patients to the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology in Washington for analysis.

Both the Chronicle's and the Post's coverage excluded the fact that many people, including many scientists, believe that there is a relationship between Morgellons, chemtrails and nanotechnology, and there does seem to be some evidence backing this up.

For instance, according to Dr. Hildegarde Staninger, private lab tests show that the outer (Morgellons) fibers are composed of a high density polyethylene fiber (HDPE) which is used to manufacture fiber optics. And, as this is a compound not found in nature this could only be explained if in fact the fibers were man-made. She writes:
"It was further determined that this material is used throughout the bio nanotechnology world as a compound to encapsulate a viral protein envelope, which is composed of a viron (1/150th times smaller than a virus) with DNA, RNA, RNAi (mutated RNA) or RNAsi linear or ring plasmids for specific functions.
Dr. Staninger also describes the similarities of chemtrail samples which were taken from spots around the U.S. and Italy. Research into the samples that were found in San Giuliani Park (Italy) showed a direct relationship to a Texas sample, with over half being the same elements. These same elements were found in the Morgellon's patients samples. The results found show a comparison to the samples which came from three distinct locations California, USA, Texas, USA and Venice, Italy thousands of miles apart but contain 7 out of 13 of the same elements with SEM's illustrating similar structures.

-- "Texas Chemtrail Samples Compared To Samples From Venice Italy," by Dr. Hildegarde Staninger

You can see her other work on Morgellons and nanotechnology here "Far-Infared Radiant Heat (FIR RH) Type Remediation for Mold and Other Unique Diseases", and here: "Morgellons: A Nano-911 Foreign Invader"

Backing up Dr. Staninger's theory that Morgellons is manmade is neurologist Dr. Edward L. Spencer MD, who spoke in 2006 to Berkeley City Council Members on behalf of the Community Environmental Advisory Commission (CEAC). He testified:
"There now exists strong data indicating that this disorder is associated with nanotechnology, specifically nano machines in the form of nanofibers. The National Science Foundation (NSF) defines nanofibers as having at least one dimension of 100 nanometer (nm) or less....This fiber did not burn until it has been heated to 1700 degrees F. Compare that with hair, which is easily burned producing a characteristic odor and has a cellular structure. The fibers are shed regularly and some grow to long lengths indicating fiber production in the human body. Dr. Janovy has stated of this blue fiber, 'it has noeukaryotic cells, it has no cell membrane, it is not a parasite, it is not biological, it is a machine.'"

-- "Infectious Man-Made Nano-Disease Spreading Globally!," by Ed Spencer, MD
And, because three doctors will hold more weight than two, let's include the research of polymer chemist, Dr. R. Michael Castle, who has studied atmospheric polymers for years. In his research he has found that some of the fibers contain bioactive materials, which can cause "serious skin lesions and diseases when absorbed into the skin." He has identified microscopic polymers comprised of genetically-engineered fungal forms mutated with viruses. He says that trillions of fusarium (fungus)/virus mutated spores), which secrete a powerful mico-toxin, are part of the air we breathe.

--"The Methodic Demise of Natural Earth: An Environmental Impact Overview," by R. Michael Castle

If this is true, that chemtrials, Morgellons and genetically-engineered pathogens and/or nanotechnology are related, then that would have to mean some kind of government involvement as only the military, or government-approved contractors, would have the clearance and capability to spray large areas in our air space (not to mention large areas around the world).

Could this explain the rash of deaths of microbiologists since 9/11? Were they cognizant of programs that others wanted to keep secret? See: "Author Theorizes 40 Microbiologists Killed Before Unleashing 'The Ultimate Epidemic," Free Press International

Would it be unthinkable that our leaders could be that evil that they would knowingly experiment on humanity with manmade pathogens that could have the potential to kill thousands, if not millions of us? This is not out of the realm of plausibility as we already know that they have been spraying biological and chemical agents on unsuspecting populations throughout the U.S. for decades (See this TV news piece about secret programs by the military in which they contaminated 239 populated areas with biological agents, exposed during Senate hearings in 1977):

Currently Dr. Staninger, Dr. Castle and Dr. Spencer are just a few of the voices in the wilderness who believe Morgellons is manmade. Undoubtedly, they will be ridiculed by many of their peers. Undoubtedly, they will be called delusional like Morgellons sufferers today. But, what happens if their research is shown to be true?

One cannot help but see the inescapable comparison between Pandora's box and what our modern-day demigods of creation -- the geneticists, bioengineers and physicists armed with Rockerfeller Foundation grants and DoD financing are concocting in secretive labs.

Even Hollywood has caught on big time to these mutant plague doomsday scenarios with movie after movie about rogue manmade viruses wiping out a good chunk of humanity, either accidentally or intentionally. And, like the May 25, 2001 released oscar-nominated film Pearl Harbor, just three months before September 11, 2001, one has to wonder if we seeing a prelude to the real thing?

Of what such evils will be unleashed by man under the mantel of science's gifts to humanity or under the pretext of national security? Even worse to contemplate is that perhaps the global elite have something more sinister in mind, like global mind control using HAARP technology, or more horribly still, a depopulation program on such a large scale as to make the depopulation project Global 2000 look like child's play.

Unfortunately, these ideas are going to be threshold concepts for most of us. Either we will able to face these scenarios as possibilities or we will reject them due to our psychological needs. As journalist Peter Phillips describes it:
"We all remember, as young children, scary locations that created deep fears. We might imagine monsters in the closet, dangers in a nighttime backyard, and creepy people in some abandoned house down the street. As we get older we build up the courage to open the closet, or walk out into the backyard to smell the night air. As adults there are still dark closets in our socio-cultural consciousness that make it impossible to even consider the possibility of the truthfulness of certain ideas. These fearful ideas might be described as threshold concepts in that they may be on the borders of discoverability, yet we deny even the potentiality of implied veracity - something is so evil it is completely unimaginable."

--"Threshold Fears and Unanswered Questions About 9/11," by Peter Phillips
The question is: Are we courageous enough to venture out in our backyards and smell the night air, even if it is contaminated with the plague?

• • •

For further information, see:

Jeff Rense radio program with Dr. Staninger and Dr. Karjoo

"Chemtrails of the World," by Mark Metcalf

Tuesday, January 8, 2008

The upcoming s-election: Which CFR-approved presidential candidate will you choose?

"Change" is the catchword in election politics today, as it is in every presidential election. Americans are desperate for change because they're tired: They're tired of the war, they're tired of the lies, and they're tired of seeing their country slowly destroyed by powerful interests. According to the TV pundits this is the reason why Obama and Huckabee won so decisively in the Iowa caucuses -- American voters believe that Obama and Huckabee will be the candidates who can bring them much needed change.

Of course, Obama and Huckabee will bring Americans change, but it will be of a superficial, insubstantial kind: a few more -- or less -- tax breaks, more job training programs, tougher penalties for corporate criminals, and, more toothless promises to get us out of the quagmire of Iraq, or, at least, just to fight it better than Bush.

One thing that will be missing is the promise of REAL change, the kind that would restore our Constitution to its 1778 status, end globalization policies that are destroying U.S. sovereignty, and, most importantly, end the completely fraudulent "war on terror" which is responsible for enacting terrible retribution on millions of innocent people around the world. Obama and Huckabee will not be these agents of change, nor will Hillary or Edwards, nor any of the other top-tiered candidates.

Why is that? It's simple: all of the presidential frontrunners have key advisors from the Council of Foreign Relations -- an organization that is actively promoting the "war on terror" and world government through globalization policies -- missions that are eroding the sovereignty of the United States.

Since the CFR insiders control the major media (see this video below) it shouldn't come as any surprise that Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich are being marginalized and discredited. These candidates have taken positions against CFR "free trade" policies like GATT and NAFTA, have called for stopping the war immediately, and have professed a strong defense of the U.S. Constitution -- something the sanctioned candidates will not do.

Unfortunately, even when these really good choices present themselves to the American people, the vast body of the electorate will not vote for them in the long run because they are told by the CFR-controlled press, and the CFR-controlled RNC and DNC, that these candidates' ideas are fringe; their concepts of protecting the Constitution, protecting American jobs and stopping a illegal war are just not mainstream ideas in a globalized, terror-filled world. We can, however, enjoy the spirited discussions they bring to the debates and fascinate over their old-fashioned beliefs and values. How quaint. (Of course, the corporate media don't exactly frame it this way, but that is essentially why these "fringe" candidates are censored and disparaged.)

Americans should have none of it.

For those of us with our frontal lobes still intact we can look for more exacting method of vetting a candidate than Andy Green's Mr Potato Head test (see picture above) Candidates pose with Clinton's Potato Head; and that is to look at who are the advisors for the top-tiered candidates. Let's start with the Democrats:

Obama has CFR member and Trilateral Commission founder Zbigniew Brzezinski advising him. Brzezinski was instrumental in arming the Mujaheddin in Afghanistan and advocating for U.S. bases in the Middle East; and Richard Clarke (CFR), the former counterterrorism czar who cried crocodile tears to the 9/11 families about how the U.S. fail them on September 11, 2001. Interestingly enough, many of Obama advisors are straight from the older Clinton cabinet (see So much for the "change" candidate.

Hillary has a who's who of prominent CFR members advising her including: Leslie Gelb, president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations; Samuel R. Berger, Bill Clinton's national security advisor; Madeline Albright, Clinton's secretary of state; Welsley Clark, NATO commander and Lee Feinstein, a prominent CFR scholar.

Edwards likes military men advising him, many of them profiting handsomely from the phony War on Terror. Ironically, one non-military advisor is Barry M. Blechman (CFR), President Carter’s assistant director of the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, an agency which was created under a Presidential Directive to disarm sovereign states to bring about world government under control of the UN. Hmmm.

According to Daniel Estulin, an award-winning investigative journalist and expert on the CFR and Bilderberg Group, the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency was sponsored by the CFR "to surrender irrevocably to the United Nations the means of protecting its (the United States) national sovereignty, and, ultimately to confiscate all of the weapons ownded by its own citizens, as party of a planned future global disarmament program." ("The True Story of the Bilderberg Group", 2007, page 101)

And, if that's not scary enough for you, read what investigative journalist, Kelley Beaucar Vlahos, has to say about Obama's and Clinton's advisors:
" less than eight names associated with the Clinton and Obama campaigns—including Indyk, Steinberg, and O’Hanlon—have turned up, in some cases multiple times, on statements and letters authored by the Project for the New American Century..."

"Led by former Reagan aide and Hoover Institution fellow Charles Hill, there is Harvard Professor Martin Kramer, who works with the Washington Institute for Near East Policy; Peter Berkowitz of Hoover; Kim Holmes of the Heritage Foundation; Stephen Rosen of Harvard; Enders Wimbush of the Hudson Institute; Commentary eminence Norman Podhoretz; and the newest addition, author Daniel Pipes, who has been waging an online war against American “Islamofascist” college professors."

Kelley Beaucar Vlahos, "War Whisperers", American Conservative Magazine, 2007

Yikes!... and these are just the Democratic candidates. Needless to say on the Republican side it is much worse. See this list from the Washington Post:

"The War Over the Wonks", Washington Post, Oct. 2., 2007

Since all the frontrunners are getting advice from Council of Foreign Relations members we should all be concerned. Unless you understand who the CFR are you won't understand the threat to our country and our freedoms. Read what these experts on the subject have to say:

“The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is the American Branch of a society which originated in England… (and) …believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established.”
“The powers of financial capitalism had (a) far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank…sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.”

-- Harvard professor and Bill Clinton mentor, Carroll Quigley. (Quigley, who was a supporter of these plans was allowed to study the elite's secret documents for over 15 years. He wrote about them in his book, "Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time and The Anglo-American Establishment.")

... and...
“The main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations is promoting the disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and national independence and submergence into an all powerful, one world government.”

“Once the ruling members of the CFR shadow government have decided that the U.S. Government should adopt a particular policy, the very substantial research facilities of (the) CFR are put to work to develop arguments, intellectual and emotional, to support the new policy, and to confound and discredit, intellectually and politically, any opposition.”

-- U.S. Navy admiral Chester Ward, a former CFR member

So, why doesn't the vast majority of Americans see through this con? Why do we keep bumping into the same group of misty-eyed voters who are adamant that if only their CFR-approved candidate gets into office they would set the world's axis right again -- a faith that is truly astonishing considering the continuous deterioration of the United States right before our eyes under both Democratic and Republican administrations, election after election.

People get fooled because the vast majority of people still get their news from corporate, "cabal" news whose role is to hide these facts from the public.

So, this leaves us with the upcoming s-election. If we want to vote pro-sovereignty, pro-Constitution, anti-war that means that the only candidate we could support is Ron Paul or Cynthia McKinney on the Green Party ticket. (I like Dennis Kucinich, but if he really said that if Hillary and Obama gets the party nomination we should vote for him/her, he has lost my vote.) Personally, I am kind of fond of social security and public education, as well as some safety-net social programs, so Cynthia will get my vote over Paul. She has also promised to re-open a full investigation into 9/11. Here is her website:

For more on the candidates' advisors, see:

"The Advisers Are Writing Our Future", The New York Times, April 18, 2007
"Hillary Inc.", The Nation, May 17, 2007
"Bilderberg 'performance' key to Edwards VP pick," World Net Daily, 2004

Wednesday, January 2, 2008

Bring in the New Year with the Impeachment of Bush and Cheney!

Two very different Rose Parades: Germany's Rose Monday Carnival parade and the U.S. Rose Bowl parade.

Don't you just love these floats! George W. Bush being spanked by the Statue Of Liberty; finding a Weapon of Mass Destruction in President Ahmadinajad's armpit; and crazed-cartoon terrorists.

These photos are from the Rose Monday carnival parade in Mainz, western Germany, on Monday, Feb. 19, 2007. Thousands of spectators attended the traditional street carnival parade in the state of Rhineland-Palatinates's capital.
(AP Photo Bernd Kammerer)

Here is a little about Carnival season:

"The "fifth season of the year" as Carnival is called, begins on November 11th at 11:11 AM. But the "crazy days" start on so-called Weiberfastnacht, the Thursday before Rosenmontag (Carnival Monday)."

"Crazy Days" indeed. And, who said the Germans don't have a sense of humor.

And... our not so crazy "crazy days" in the States...

New World Order floats, stormtroopers, and bat planes from hell.

Note George Lucas' Imperial Stormtroopers holding up the flags of the world. A certain New World Order reference. Burrrrr.
(Photos taken from the 2007 Rose Bowl parade.)

And, this year, signs of unrest from real patriots.

And here is a press release from the White Rose Coalition Action (not so coincidentally taking their name from the White Rose Society, a German resistance group to Nazism during the Third Reich)
"Cindy Sheehan Joins Activists Planning Impeachment/Pro-Peace Protest at New Year's Rose Parade

Los Angeles - California (December 18, 2007) Local and national pro-Impeachment and pro-Peace American citizens will stage non-violent protests and demonstrations throughout the Rose Parade in Pasadena, California, on Tuesday, January 1, 2008 beginning at 7:30 a.m. with support from Cindy Sheehan and the Camp Casey Peace Institute. The convergence of activists is called the White Rose Coalition, in honor of the resistance movement in Munich in 1942. The White Rose Coalition includes members of the Los Angeles National Impeachment Center (LANIC), CODEPINK, Troops Out Now Coalition, World Can't Wait, ANSWER, Progressive Democrats of America, the Green Party, Veterans for Peace, United for Peace and Justice, and others.

The groups are calling for impeaching George W. Bush and Dick Cheney for high crimes and misdemeanors, and to end U.S. occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan . Rep. Dennis Kucinich [OH] has sponsored two resolutions in Congress to impeach Vice President Dick Cheney: H. Res. 333 and H. Res. 799. He is drafting an extended version relating to President Bush. The patriots gathered on January 1, 2008 will be sending a strong pro-Impeachment and pro-Peace message to this Administration in opposition to the continuing occupations of Iraq, Afghanistan and the growing pressure by Cheney and others to bomb Iran.

"This administration has shredded Constitutional protections and is now apparently planning another illegal military strike, this time to bomb Iran," says Cynthia Mather , a spokesperson for LANIC. "The consequences of such an assault on global well-being and security would be catastrophic," she said. "Congress is obligated to act before it is too late. But the Democrats are not making any move to stop it, so impeachment is our only recourse."

"Numbers of protestors and demonstrators from the various groups could be in the hundreds or in the thousands", said Peter Thottam, Executive Director of LANIC . "We expect this to be a national day of impeachment visibility, with folks joining from all parts of the country. It is hard to gauge how many will show up, but according to the latest MSNBC poll, of 584,000 people asked if they thought Bush had committed impeachable offenses, 89 per cent said yes! There is a tremendous level of anger and frustration out there. I doubt if our politicians in Washington D.C. have any idea just how much."

See link

May 2008 see the end of the fascistic "Crazy Days"